Here are the posters which i've created which regarding the phishing scam:
Potrait Version
A Desirable Society Is Achieved In Direct Proposition of Effort We Apply!
Potrait Version
Image taken from: http://www.britannica.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/cybercrime.jpg
image taken from: http://www.cybersecurity.org.my/properties/images/services/011.gif
Colonel Husin even quoted that, if in the future they cannot cope anymore, we may need to have a cybercourt! It can be used to speed up the prosecution of cyber criminals, encouraging more specialized judges and lawyers. According to CYBERSECURITY MALAYSIA, a very challenging issue in cyber crime investigation is the gathering of evidence. If there is a cyber court, there will be a need for a provision on how the court can facilitate and give empowerment for evidence collection in a much, much easier way. The setting up of the court must take into consideration the bottleneck and how it can help ease evidence gathering.
It is due to the fact that the country's cyberpopulation is increasing, the number of online transactions or other activities will increase in tandem, which will likely mean more incidents of cybercrime. Advancement of broadband and wireless enable everyone of us to make full use of Internet. However, such medium can also be used as cybercrimes where the more criminals taking advantage over the situation, conducting crimes online. The situation will definitely get worst when the global economy is facing recession, as everyone wish to earn more money than others! And this is one of the "short-cut" for the criminals, without realising the consequences of it.
On the other hand, according to SUARAM " Ongoing Abuse of Police Power Must End!", there was a latest news where the police misuse their power in the arrest of Hindraf leader, S Jayathas, on the grounds of wearing an anti-ISA badge when Hindraf had a prayer ceremony, 13 December 2009 to mark the Internal Security Act (ISA) detention of five Hindraf leaders two years ago.
The police did not inform S Jayathas of the grounds of arrest even after they were asked.Such action indeed lead the police committed the violation of Article 5(3) of the Federal Constitution which states that when "a person is arrested, he shall be informed as soon as may be of the ground of his arrest..."
Moreover, according to Article 10(1)(a) of the Federal Constitution states that every citizen has the right to freedom of expression. S Jayathas has the right to express his opinions under the protection of constitution and his arrest is a violation of his constitutional right.
Police should carry out the job effective and efficiently, however, in this situation, it seems to be opposite. If such situation continue to happen, i believe this will definitely lower the confidence of public towards the accountability of police. If none of us put faith in cops, this will threaten the safety of our country, as we all know that cooperation between public and cops are essential in the effort of reducing the crime rate. Without the help between one another, not only the safety innocence public will be affected, but also disrupt the development of our country!
It is the time for the Government to intervene in the matter, enforcing the Police Reform Act 2002. It is basically "An Act to make new provision about the supervision, administration, functions and conduct of police forces, police officers and other persons serving with, or carrying out functions in relation to, the police; to amend police powers and to provide for the exercise of police powers by persons who are not police officers; to amend the law relating to anti-social behaviour orders; to amend the law relating to sex offender orders; and for connected purposes". Besides, police must be more committed to perform their tasks/jobs, dispel negative perception in order to restore the public confidence towards the force.
image taken from: http://the-malaysian.blogspot.com/2007_01_01_archive.html
Image taken from: http://www.humantraffic.org/
Besides, Malaysia-Australia also agree to fight for Human Trafficking in working visit of Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein to Australia. A close cooperation will be addressed and the efforts of programmes should be carried out to deter the issue. He also added that the involving agencies including police, the Immigration Department, Foreign Ministry, the Attorney-General's Department and the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency.
Image taken from psixp.wordpress.com
In Bangkit.net, i have found out that Malaysia scored miserably in the international ranking on privacy for 2007 mainly due to the continued use of the Internal Security Act which allows for police search and seizure of evidence without a warrant, the installation of closed-circuit television (CCTV) and the use of biometrics to monitor immigrants in an environment where privacy laws. There are numerous cases which reveal our privacy to the public around the world. The case of Elizabeth Wong, who was a Bukit Lanjan assemblyman and Selangor executive council member, has caused her to resign her post as the consequences of her nude picture being circulated to the public through MMS. This incident strongly intrude her personal life and privacy. Indirectly, people have conspired to undermine her credibility as Selangor state exco member. In my point of view, she is the victim afterall, we should not
point our fingers at her by saying that she hasn't performing her work ethically.There were the possibilities that some protestors might want to pull her down from her current position by using this scandal. Elizabeth indeed needs a huge courage to overcome this challenges. I have read her blog which stated that she's leaving Malaysia as she felt it's humiliated after receiving the further notice by the media they will continue to publish even more graphical, sensational stories of her private life. Can you imagine how stressful it is when you were in that situation? Longing for the need to rest and search for peace of mind, she hopes to get away all the stormy events surrounding her. It is the fact that everyone needs their own privacy, so do i. None of us will like people to invade our own space without noticing us. Since none of us like to be invaded, why can't the artists and politicians perceive the right to be left alone as well? If there isn't a deterrant law to take against the people who involving in intrution of privacy, how can we as a Malaysian feel safe enough to move around?
Image taken from http://ibspro.net/
Perhaps, some of us,especially girls, might worry that there was a hidden camera which was installed in public toilet/lifts or even changing rooms! This really happens around us, as there was a case where a man was fined only RM100 for taking a picture of a young girl urinating at a public toilet with his handphone cameara. Do you think that it is reasonable enough to charge that man for minimal money? I think that this kind of action should be reviewed to be appropriate with the times and damage that it caused (trauma especially). If the deter is not punished with any heavy penalty, there will definitely be more future offenders who will slowly divulge our privacy life, none of us will know when are we going to be the next target. . .
Since ANTHONY failed to give sufficient notice of resignation to his employer, he was liable to pay his employer an indemnity in lieu of the period of notice due. However, this had become debatable since ANTHONY was not issued with an appointment letter.
Also, the officer said, the employer can be issued with a notice or a compound for not providing its workers with appointment letters.
In my opinion, according to Employment Act 1955,Section 12(2) The length of termination notice shall be the same for both employer and employee and shall be determined by a provision made in writing for such notice in the term of the contract of service, or, in the absence of such provision in writing, shall not be less than:
(a) four weeks' notice if the employee has been so employed for less than two years on the date on which the notice is given;
(b) six weeks' notice if he has been so employed for two years or more but less than five years on such date;
(c ) eight weeks' notice if the has been so employed for five years or more on such date;
provided that this section shall not be taken to prevent either party from waiving his right to a notice under this subsection.
So, Anthony should not just quit the job as he likes. Though there was no legal offer letter to him, he should understand that the manager will surely sue him under the Employment Act, making him to be liable.